Comments on: Blacksburg’s First & Main – One Year Later http://www.NRVLiving.com/2009/11/23/blacksburgs-first-main-one-year-later/ Real Estate in Blacksburg, Christiansburg, and Radford - I'm sometimes on topic, occasionally irreverent, always Real. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:39:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jeremyhttp://www.NRVLiving.com/2009/11/23/blacksburgs-first-main-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-935 Jeremy Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:32:30 +0000 http://www.nrvliving.com/?p=1808#comment-935 Mike, thanks for the comment. Apparently I wasn't clear, what I meant was that the developer was blocked from performing on some of the promises it made to the tenants - prospective and current - when it was soliciting leases. Now that the state Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Town, many of those promises might not be able to come to fruition. So I was wondering aloud whether a suit made any sense.Didn't mean to imply that the decision over whether or not a cinema was installed had anything to do with the Supreme Court's ruling; I have no knowledge of that. Good catch. Mike, thanks for the comment. Apparently I wasn’t clear, what I meant was that the developer was blocked from performing on some of the promises it made to the tenants – prospective and current – when it was soliciting leases. Now that the state Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Town, many of those promises might not be able to come to fruition. So I was wondering aloud whether a suit made any sense.

Didn’t mean to imply that the decision over whether or not a cinema was installed had anything to do with the Supreme Court’s ruling; I have no knowledge of that. Good catch.

]]> By: Jeremyhttp://www.NRVLiving.com/2009/11/23/blacksburgs-first-main-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-1944 Jeremy Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:32:00 +0000 http://www.nrvliving.com/?p=1808#comment-1944 Mike, thanks for the comment. Apparently I wasn't clear, what I meant was that the developer was blocked from performing on some of the promises it made to the tenants - prospective and current - when it was soliciting leases. Now that the state Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Town, many of those promises might not be able to come to fruition. So I was wondering aloud whether a suit made any sense.Didn't mean to imply that the decision over whether or not a cinema was installed had anything to do with the Supreme Court's ruling; I have no knowledge of that. Good catch. Mike, thanks for the comment. Apparently I wasn’t clear, what I meant was that the developer was blocked from performing on some of the promises it made to the tenants – prospective and current – when it was soliciting leases. Now that the state Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Town, many of those promises might not be able to come to fruition. So I was wondering aloud whether a suit made any sense.

Didn’t mean to imply that the decision over whether or not a cinema was installed had anything to do with the Supreme Court’s ruling; I have no knowledge of that. Good catch.

]]> By: Mike A.http://www.NRVLiving.com/2009/11/23/blacksburgs-first-main-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-933 Mike A. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:21:27 +0000 http://www.nrvliving.com/?p=1808#comment-933 "Now a few tenants have sued the developer, but if the developer is blocked by state law, isn’t a suit a mute point?"How was the cinema blocked by state law? “Now a few tenants have sued the developer, but if the developer is blocked by state law, isn’t a suit a mute point?”

How was the cinema blocked by state law?

]]> By: Mike A.http://www.NRVLiving.com/2009/11/23/blacksburgs-first-main-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-1943 Mike A. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:21:00 +0000 http://www.nrvliving.com/?p=1808#comment-1943 "Now a few tenants have sued the developer, but if the developer is blocked by state law, isn’t a suit a mute point?"How was the cinema blocked by state law? “Now a few tenants have sued the developer, but if the developer is blocked by state law, isn’t a suit a mute point?”

How was the cinema blocked by state law?

]]>